COMELEC: Ang Ladlad is Immoral

In a not-so surprising turn of events, the Commission on Elections has yet again denied Ang Ladlad’s application for party-list accreditation. And this time, the reason is immorality.

Read this very deplorable news from Newsbreak below and see if you won’t get offended or angered by how the COMELEC officers think these days.

In light of this COMELEC decision, Ang Ladlad is calling all its members, allies, friends and supporters to a general assembly on 14 November 2009, Saturday, 8am-12nn at the Seminar Room 108 of the University Hotel, UP Diliman. For directions, call the University Hotel at landline 926.1975/926.1953 or mobile 0920.471.0111.

It’s time to get up and stand up for our rights!

FOR ‘IMMORALITY,’ GAY GROUP DENIED PARTY-LIST ACCREDITATION
by Lilita Balane
http://newsbreak.com.ph

Ang Ladlad’s own petition indicating intimate same-sex relations, brought that decision upon itself.

The Commission on Elections (Comelec) has rejected the petition of a group representing the “third sex” to be accredited for the party list on the ground that it “tolerates immorality, which offends religious beliefs.”

In an 8-page resolution, the Comelec cited the Ang Ladlad LGBT’s advocacy of sexual immorality with same-sex relationships.

The group–which claims to represent lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and trans-genders–brought the unfavorable decision upon itself. In its petition for accreditation, it described itself as representative of a marginalized and under-represented sector that is particularly disadvantaged because of their sexual orientation and gender identity.

Moreover, it defined the sexual orientation of the sector it is representing as capable of “profound emotional, affectional, and sexual orientation to, and intimate and sexual relations with, individuals of a different gender, of the same gender, or more than one gender.”

Thus, the Comelec’s resolution that “the definition of LGBT sector makes it crystal clear that petitioners tolerates immorality which offends religious beliefs.”

The resolution quoted passages from the Bible and the Koran about God showing his wrath against people who engage in same sex relationship.
Protecting the youth

Although Republic Act 7941, the party list law, doesn’t specifically list down immorality as a ground for banning a group from the party list, its Section 6.2 is indicative. It says that a group may be denied party-list participation if “it advocates violence or unlawful means to seek its goal.”

The Comelec’s law department said that laws should be incorporated in all contracts, permits, license, including accreditations. In the case of Ang Ladlad, the group collides with the provision of the Civil Code and the Revised Penal Code. Comelec said that Article 201 of the Revised Penal Code penalizes immoral doctrines, among them publicly expounding or proclaiming doctrines openly contrary to public morality. While Article 1409 of the Civil Code considers as void contracts whose purpose is contrary to morals and good customs.

“Should this Commission grant the petition, we will be exposing our youth to an environment that does not conform to the teachings of our faith…. As an agency of the government, ours too is the State’s avowed duty to protect our youth from moral and spiritual degradation,” the resolution said.

Ang Ladlad, through its president Danton Remoto, called the Comelec’s decision unfounded and based solely on religious beliefs.

“This is a decision by a very old man with obsolete ideas on homosexuality. They quoted something from the Internet, and did not even visit the library to research. This is an evidence of intellectual bankruptcy,” he said, adding that Comelec did not arbitrate based on evidence and documents, but just quoted verses from the Bible.

Remoto belied that they are advocating immorality, but they are supporting human rights for all.

He said Ang Ladlad is set to file a motion for reconsideration, but is expecting the Comelec to junk their appeal. Remoto said they will also bring their petition to the Supreme Court.

If all else fails, Remoto said he will run for a senatorial seat next year to prove that Ang Ladlad has the support of the sector he represents.

In 2007, the Comelec junked Ang Ladlad’s petition for accreditation for its failure to disclose the scope of its membership. The group claimed to be a national party, but field offices of the Comelec said that the group didn’t have chapters in most regions of the country. (Newsbreak)

Related Posts with Thumbnails

 


This entry was posted on Friday, November 13th, 2009 at 7:22 am and is filed under Ang Ladlad, Balitang Bakla, Danton Remoto, Gay Issues, Gay News, Gay Politics . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Responses to “ COMELEC: Ang Ladlad is Immoral ”

  1. Man in Heat says:

    Pamantayan kasi nila ng moralidad yung “Hello Garci” Scam at pangungurakot ng mga namumuno sa komisyon nila.

  2. Twin-Skies says:

    I’m not gay, but I doubt I have to be to see through COMELEC’s bigoted reasoning

    Disgusting – since when did it become the business of a government office to impose religious doctrine on its constituents?

  3. Dom13 says:

    Boo COMELEC, BOO!!

  4. ian says:

    I symphatize with the LADLAD group, this commissioner should review his Consitution subject. the reason why they denied the petetion of LadLad because they have to protect the youth “As an agency of the government, ours too is the State’s avowed duty under Section 13, Article II of the Constitution to protect our youth from moral and spiritual degradation,”. It clearly shows that they are favoring the catholic rilegion beliefe, which i think any gov. agency should not do. Ang kapal ng mukha mu Commissioner Nicodemo Ferrer kung sinasabi mu na you are not condeming us, I ehoed what great Boy abunda says last night in SNN “isang KATANGAHAN” ang paniniwala na ang mga bakla at tumboy ay sinasabing mga imoral..

  5. Jason says:

    I;m neither pro nor anti gay yet there are more issues that to declare a partylist of the LGBT community. One has wrote a bill criminalizing same-sex marriage YET no one even raises the issue of discrimination, especially ETHNIC discrimination of the Philippines. Lack of law results to people CHOOSING to be IGNORANT and ARROGANT toward MINORITIES(An example was the latestt supposedly ethnic joke about the Igorots by MS. Pangilinan which was done right in front of the Igorots)

    Before they parade about homosexuality being immoral, I’d like them to pin down first corruption and minority discrimination that is VERY prevalent(far more IMMORAL than being homosexuals) in the country. Something they bother not doing something about. Who are they to speak about immorality?

  6. G says:

    Ha, they allowed Erap who is openly immoral by the Bible definition (having many mistresses) but they won’t allow Ladlad? Wow.



Be the first to comment! Leave a Reply.

twitter facebook plurk flickr
tumblr technorati email

  • Recent Posts

  • Search


  • Subscribe in a reader

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Privacy Policy


    AClickyGay and Lesbian Blogs -  Blog Catalog Blog DirectoryDirectory of GLBT BlogsWeb Hosting Directory by Blog Flux Ratified.org PhilippinesPersonal - Top Blogs Philippines hit counter

    Vote for Bakla!



    Add to Technorati Favorites

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Pages

ss_blog_claim=da86d5f9b71351afd433769cee397e37